Bridge entity

ICON–SODAX Migration Bridge

The ICON–SODAX migration bridge is the migration and withdrawal path connecting ICON-held ICX/bnUSD with SODAX-side assets through the ICON migration contract and SODAX Asset Manager. On August 27, 2026, a replay defect in signed withdrawal-message uniqueness handling allowed repeated releases of foundation-held assets. The affected withdrawal path was paused, the ICON Network was temporarily halted, and a corrected contract was deployed before network operation resumed on August 28.

activereviewedcurrent

Bridge facts

Canonical name
ICON–SODAX Migration Bridge
Type
Asset Bridge
Status
Active
Confidence
High
Primary chains
Unknown
Primary assets
Unknown
Operator
ICON Foundation / SODAX
Ecosystem
ICON / SODAX
Launch date
Unknown
End date
Unknown
Terminal reason
Not applicable / unknown
Last reviewed
2026-09-04
Last verified
2026-09-04

Incident cases

  • ICON–SODAX 2026 withdrawal-message replay exploit2026-08-27

    On August 27, 2026, an attacker replayed two previously legitimate signed withdrawal messages through the ICON migration contract / SODAX Asset Manager path. A serial-number precision defect meant the uniqueness check and signature verification did not validate the same exact value, allowing 1,490 successful repeated calls and unauthorized release of foundation-held assets. The withdrawal path was paused and ICON Network was temporarily halted before a corrected contract and additional relayer control were deployed.

    Exploit150.2 ETH + 31,204 USDC confirmed net lossUnresolved

Evidence records

Official URL status

Official URL recorded as live: https://www.icon.foundation/blog/2026/icon-network-replay-exploit-post-mortem
Independent incident archive

Help maintain bridge history

Support incident linkage, lifecycle updates, evidence preservation, broken-link replacement, and corrections.

Support BIR
Record maintenance

Report a correction

Report missing evidence, incorrect dates, outcome changes, recovery details, reimbursement status, or broken links. GitHub Issues are preferred for structured review; the Google Form is available if you do not use GitHub.